
Industry Scenarios
Built for the industries where governance is the law.
Pharma and biotech, financial services, healthcare, government and defense, manufacturing, energy and utilities, insurance, education. Anywhere regulated, federated, or audit-driven. Three deep scenarios below.
Industry coverage
Eight regulated industries. One platform. Same answer.
The audit chain pharma uses for 21 CFR Part 11 is the same chain banks use for SOX 404. The self-hosted posture that keeps PHI inside a hospital network is the same posture FERPA needs for student records. Federated, governed, tamper-evident, self-hosted.
Pharma & Biotech
21 CFR Part 11, ALCOA+, FDA inspection prep in minutes
Financial Services
SOX 404, AML/KYC golden customer view
Healthcare
HIPAA, self-hosted: PHI never leaves the network
Government & Defense
FISMA / NIST 800-53, air-gap capable, ITAR by residency
Manufacturing
Federated supply-chain data products with blast radius
Energy & Utilities
NERC CIP: governed access to operational data
Insurance
Claims-data audit chain and permission proof
Education
FERPA: student-record access controls and audit
Three deep scenarios below. The platform applies the same way to every industry above.
Scenario 1: Pharma & Biotech
10 Oncology Sources, 4 Months, Got Nowhere
The Problem
A pharma company needs to unify 10 oncology data sources: clinical trial management (Oracle), patient registries (Postgres), lab results (REST API), adverse events (MSSQL), and research publications (S3 CSV exports).
They spent 4 months with an internal team and a systems integrator. Result: a stale weekly CSV dump that breaks every time a schema changes, and nothing an FDA inspector would accept.
With Integrius
Deploy Core inside their own infrastructure, air-gap capable, no phone-home. Connect all 10 sources through the setup wizard. No code, no ETL pipelines.
Create a "Unified Oncology View" data product with a named, accountable owner.
Search: "Find all patients in the BEACON-3 trial". Federated results from trial management, lab results, and adverse events in one call.
Optic: "Which clinical trial has the most missing data?" An instant KPI, governed, with the answer traced back to source.
Optic: "Which trial sites have the highest dropout rate?" A ranked table, the right chart, and a written summary.
FDA inspection prep: the 21 CFR Part 11 audit chain is walked end to end, e-signatures and all, in minutes instead of weeks of document pulls.
A compliance officer proves the marketing team cannot see patient PII, with evidence, in seconds.
Blast radius: before retiring a legacy lab system, the team sees every downstream data product it would break.
Result
What took 4 months and failed is now running in production: governed, 21 CFR Part 11 compliant, inspection-ready. Starting at €5,000/month on the Pilot tier.
Scenario 2: Financial Services
8 Systems, 1 Customer, No Golden Record
The Problem
A mid-tier investment bank holds KYC data in 8 systems, each with its own version of the customer. When compliance asks "show me everything about Acme Holdings", a junior analyst spends 2 days manually searching each system, and SOX controls testing means more weeks of evidence gathering.
With Integrius
Connect all 8 systems holding customer data.
Build a golden customer view: one entity-keyed data product joining CRM, trading, billing, and compliance records in real time.
Search: "Acme Holdings". One governed result spanning all 8 systems, instead of a junior analyst spending 2 days searching each one.
Optic: "What's our exposure to Acme Holdings?" An aggregated answer with KPIs and a trend chart, RBAC enforced before the query runs.
SOX 404: the tamper-evident audit chain gives internal controls testing a verifiable record of who touched what, when.
AML/KYC: the golden customer view becomes the single reference for screening and investigations.
GDPR: right to erasure handled in one atomic transaction, with a chained audit row proving it happened.
Result
2 days to seconds
From manual system-by-system search to one governed golden customer view
One audit chain
Tamper-evident evidence for SOX 404 controls testing, on tap
Scenario 3: Government & Defense
Every Vendor Wanted the Cloud. The Data Could Not Leave.
The Problem
A defense program needs to unify data across mission systems inside an air-gapped network. ITAR-controlled data cannot cross the boundary. FISMA requires NIST 800-53 controls with evidence.
Every data platform they evaluated phones home, requires a SaaS control plane, or sends telemetry. All of them are disqualified before the first demo.
With Integrius
Deploy Core inside the air-gapped enclave. Zero SaaS dependencies, no phone-home, nothing to allowlist outbound.
Connect mission systems through the same 16 connectors used everywhere else. ITAR data never leaves the boundary, by architecture.
Data products stood up with RBAC: 4 built-in roles, 24 granular permissions, field-level access control.
FISMA / NIST 800-53 control mapping handed to the assessor: audit chain, access enforcement, and session controls are platform features, not custom builds.
Every access lands in the tamper-evident, hash-chained audit log. Verification fails loudly if anything is altered.
Blast radius analysis before every schema or access change. No surprises in systems where surprises are unacceptable.
Optic runs inside the same enclave: local LLM inference via Ollama, so even the AI layer never reaches outward.
Result
Air-gapped, day one
The full platform, including the AI layer, runs inside the enclave
Zero bytes outbound
No SaaS dependencies, no telemetry, ITAR residency by architecture